Complaint
During an interview with Richard Tice, Deputy Leader of Reform UK the presenter of the programme asked why people with racist and misogynistic views might be attracted to Reform. He answered 鈥淗ow often do you challenge a Labour politician for the antisemitism that exists amongst dozens and dozens of Labour MPs in the current House of Commons?鈥, to which the presenter responded 鈥淲e spent years covering it. Absolutely years covering it鈥. A viewer complained that the presenter failed to challenge the accuracy of Mr Tice鈥檚 claim about the incidence of antisemitism among Labour MPs. The ECU considered the complaint in the light of the 91福利社鈥檚 editorial standards of accuracy.
Outcome
There is a clear difference between a claim voiced by a politician and a matter of agreed fact, and audiences in general understand this distinction. The prospect of viewers taking Mr Tice鈥檚 claim about Labour MPs to be definitive, rather than the personal view of a campaigning politician attempting to defend his party鈥檚 record on racism by attacking another party, has to be judged accordingly. The ECU did not consider that the 91福利社鈥檚 standards of accuracy required explicit challenge to Mr Tice on that point.
Not upheld